| "The views expressed by others are not necessarily shared by me personally but all views and perspectives are respected" |
| HOME NEW POSTINGS CONSCIOUSNESS UFOs PHOTOGRAPHY CROP CIRCLE RESEARCH PRESENTATIONS FARM MONITOR STORE MEDIA BIOGRAPHY 2012 DEBATE CLIMATE CHANGE QUOTATIONS LETTERS BLOG CONTACT OBSERVATORY WELLNESS |
Letter from the family of Paul Vigay, August 25th 2012
The alleged claims and photographs presented by Robbert van den Broeke have just been brought
to our attention. As the family of Paul Vigay we feel that it would have been common courtesy for us
to have been informed directly, before it being published around the internet and becoming part of a
public controversy. We feel that no sensitivity or respect has been shown to the families of the four
men who are currently the subjects of these claims and this is upsetting.
We would like to echo the objections which we have read in the statement from Pat Delgado's family.
We believe these alleged reports to be false and find it hard to believe that anyone would take them
at all seriously.
We do not recognise Paul in the message Robbert van den Broeke claims to have come from him
and do not believe that it would be Paul's wish for his name and his image to be used in this way.
This appears to be a disingenuous attempt at political point scoring, abusing the truth and
reputations of our loved ones to try and add value and status to the personal work of Robbert van
den Broeke and Nancy Talbott. If their work has truth and value it does not need the defence of the
dead who it is (in) conveniently not possible to question on this matter.
I (Paul's sister) believe in a spirit life as did my brother and would fully welcome any genuine
communication or evidence from my brother, either directly or through a medium. In my opinion
these reports do not provide any such evidence and can only be damaging to the work of authentic
mediumship.
In his life, Paul worked with many different people of many different and sometimes opposing
viewpoints, whilst maintaining and evaluating his own independent thoughts and opinions in his
research/search for truth about crop circles and other issues. We cannot know where his research
would have developed and what his views would be in current debates. It is insulting to his integrity
for him to be used to add weight to some kind of personal attack against his former friend and
colleague, Colin Andrews.
Frances Vigay (sister) and on behalf of my parents.
The alleged claims and photographs presented by Robbert van den Broeke have just been brought
to our attention. As the family of Paul Vigay we feel that it would have been common courtesy for us
to have been informed directly, before it being published around the internet and becoming part of a
public controversy. We feel that no sensitivity or respect has been shown to the families of the four
men who are currently the subjects of these claims and this is upsetting.
We would like to echo the objections which we have read in the statement from Pat Delgado's family.
We believe these alleged reports to be false and find it hard to believe that anyone would take them
at all seriously.
We do not recognise Paul in the message Robbert van den Broeke claims to have come from him
and do not believe that it would be Paul's wish for his name and his image to be used in this way.
This appears to be a disingenuous attempt at political point scoring, abusing the truth and
reputations of our loved ones to try and add value and status to the personal work of Robbert van
den Broeke and Nancy Talbott. If their work has truth and value it does not need the defence of the
dead who it is (in) conveniently not possible to question on this matter.
I (Paul's sister) believe in a spirit life as did my brother and would fully welcome any genuine
communication or evidence from my brother, either directly or through a medium. In my opinion
these reports do not provide any such evidence and can only be damaging to the work of authentic
mediumship.
In his life, Paul worked with many different people of many different and sometimes opposing
viewpoints, whilst maintaining and evaluating his own independent thoughts and opinions in his
research/search for truth about crop circles and other issues. We cannot know where his research
would have developed and what his views would be in current debates. It is insulting to his integrity
for him to be used to add weight to some kind of personal attack against his former friend and
colleague, Colin Andrews.
Frances Vigay (sister) and on behalf of my parents.
| Medium Robbert van den Broeke claims images of Pat Delgado and David Chorley appeared on his camera with messages for Robbert and Nancy Talbott. The Delgado Family Issue statement HERE |
| Medium Robbert van den Broeke claims two more deceased Crop Circle Researchers, Paul Vigay and David Kingston appeared with messages and warnings for Colin Andrews. HERE |
| The Family of David Chorley issue a statement and warning to Robbert van den Broeke. No response from Robbert or Nancy Talbott. HERE |
| The Family of Paul Vigay Issue Statement - to be sent to Medium Robbert van den Broeke Posted August 26, 2012 |
| Colin Andrews Comment: Following the statements made by these families and myself, no response has been forthcoming from Nancy Talbott or Robbert van den Broeke. Most people who have followed the crop circle subject will be aware of the shock that was endured by the sudden death of this young, likeable and loving man, Paul Vigay. Paul was also one of the few who did excellent research in the field. A full understanding is demanded of what has transpired with these claims by Robbert and posted on Nancy Talbott's website. If they believe these photographic images are real and the messages too, then common respect and dignity for the families and myself, to whom messages and a warning were allegedly sent, should be forthcoming. An in depth investigation into part of these claims is near completion and will be posted soon. Only when all sides and all beliefs find common ground to share details and data, will such seemingly outrageous claims be understood and moved forward. As things stand, this is a very sad day when the names of loved ones are used by someone, or something (unproven) with such total disregard for the feelings of those affected. Let me spell this out one more time for those who keep going deaf regarding my extensive efforts to contact Robbert, Stan and also Gatekeeper Nancy Talbott.. I have tried numerous times directly and via mutual friends of Nancy Talbott to discuss these cases, to talk to Robbert and or Stan themselves. Each approach has been met with, not just refusal but negative and aggressive words from Talbott. A challenge for Robbert to work on a sitting with me was suggested by David Haith on this website and that challenge was conveyed to a person called Enrico who works on Robberts website, to be forwarded to him. Many messages and peaceful approaches were communicated to Enrico as well as others who prefer I do not name. The Chorley family have also made efforts to reach Nancy Talbott directly and so far again she has not responded. None of the families or myself have received any communications from these people. --------------- Enrico from the Netherlands who helps Robbert van den Broeke with his website has responded to the latest posting on Andy Russell's website ( Circular State of Mind ) and Andy has reacted: HERE |
| UPDATED August 27, 2012 An exchange between Robberts helper Enrico and UK researcher, Andy Russell Bottom of page. |