| HOME CONSCIOUSNESS UFOs PHOTOGRAPHY CROP CIRCLE RESEARCH PRESENTATIONS FARM MONITOR FUTURE EARTH STORE MEDIA BIOGRAPHY 2012 DEBATE CLIMATE CHANGE QUOTATIONS LETTERS BLOG CONTACT OBSERVATORY WELLNESS |
| "The views expressed by others are not necessarily shared by Colin Andrews personally. All perspectives are respected" |
| Actual Field notes and drawings submitted by the plant sampling team. As can be seen here and in the video, they made no efforts what so ever to give anything but accurate information - they did not give any impression that the samples came from different spots within one common event, as Talbott falsely claimed. They clearly marked two separate events 100 feet apart, one as wind damage (as stated by farmer Geoff Smith) and the second a small grapeshot crop circle. The only thing not stated and in line with legitimate blind testing protocol, was that the small circle was made by BLT's own sampling team, who themselves had become concerned by BLT's findings and assessments (below) |
---------------------------------------
| Most damming of all came these comments from Levengood in his BLT report, seen in part here, that the area marked as 'wind damage', as stated by the farmer, was not wind damage at all but transient energy of an even higher degree than the small circle nearby. The circle which was observed made by the sampling team. The blind test confirmed the concerns of the sampling team as well as many other serious researchers such as George Bishop a council member of CCCS along with Montague Keen a farmer of 30 years and myself. |
| I am sorry to say I don`t have any of the reports that I received from BLT not that there were that many anyway, we never seemed to get much in return for all the work we did for them. I do remember that the samples that we took from some wind damage and the circle that James and I made that time near Danebury Ring, according to Levengood they were all circle related because they had the so called 'circle energies' in them. James and I had our doubts about the results of several samples sent to Levengood, that is why we wanted to give him some blind samples. What he said about them confirmed our suspicions. We didnt do a lot for BLT after that because we thought we were wasting our time. I am sorry that I have not got any of the crop research papers anymore, they got lost when I moved to North Wales. I am just presuming the boxes got thrown away in the move. Shelly CA Comment: Fortunately I have many of them in the Andrews Archive. |
BLT's Own Primary Sampling Team Had Grave Suspicions and Speaks Out.
| Shelly Keel |
| Please consider making a donation to ensure this 32 year long research continues |
| He has not always been popular, but its been Andrews persistance that has brought him to learn most of the moving parts to this mystery. |
SELECT >>>
<<< SELECT
| BLIND TESTING INCREDIBLE CLAIMS FROM BLT ANALYSIS OF PLANTS FROM CROP CIRCLES & WIND DAMAGE. Colin Andrews - updated April 21, 2015 |
Continued
| Calling the kettle black: William Levengood secretly "Blind Tested" a sharp eyed friend with soil samples sent by Pat Delgado: See letter below sent to Pat by Levengood, February 24, 1991. - Thanks to Andrews Archive |