Bookmark and Share
CROP CIRCLES
Award winning film-maker Terje Toftenes who made the documentary "Crop Circles: Crossovers From Another
Dimension" appeared unexpectedly via Skype on Circlemakers TV during the show this week (May 18th, 2011).

Terje told the show host Matthew Williams that he became interested and involved in crop circles in 2002 and had
been convinced they were not made by people. His film received awards but now he felt foolish and embarrassed
he said but went on the congratulate the people making them because they had made such a good job of them.  He
told Matthew that he thought it was time for the truth about all this to be told and went on to say that he was
equally convinced now that there were also strange things happening around the circles.
Crop Circles - The Final Phase and The Truth.
Who or What Is Behind The Intelligence of
Interaction?
-
Filmmakers Scrap as the Myth Makers are
Exposed but What Comes Next?
Watch live streaming video from circlemakerstv at livestream.com
By Colin Andrews
May 20, 2011
Circlemakers TV
Most people who have followed this subject know that I came to this conclusion myself eleven years ago and
announced it on BBC television during 2000. I revealed the outcome of a two year investigation specifically into
people making crop circles and rounded up the figures that showed then that around 80% of crop circles in
England during
1999 and 2000 were man made. That announcement resulted in me being ostracized by
numerous well known researchers and indeed media people like Terje  and filmmaker Suzanne Taylor
themselves. I received hate mail and public hanging by certain famous people.  Im pleased to say since my
findings have been born out to be accurate, many now acknowledge this, in fact I have since received awards
myself for that landmark work. My research website is a top ranked site with thousands of visitors a day -
hundreds from the past who did not like what I had to say back in 2000 but who now can see the value of
working with facts rather than preset beliefs.

What we all know is that when the social environment in any subject is established, in this case by a small group
who closed ranks to convey that 'crop circles are real', breaking ranks marginalises you. Its all part of their plan.
These social engineers know that to allow this to change would weaken the myth that feeds sales of books, radio
and TV programs etc, that they have an interest in. It takes courage to set out a new marker, a marker that isn't
so good for business or those egos. To take on new ground you have to know your inner truth and have
supportive friends and or family as I have and be focuses enough to keep at it - The search for truth is never
going to be easy. I take my hat off to Terje for doing so and also to Matthew Williams at Circlemakers TV for
communicating this. Matthew was the first person who made circles to offer to me what was going on. Beyond
the act of making them though, I  knew there was something else less easily explained away, i.e. circles I had
seen in distant lands and also in England, that were
not made by 3 feet long boards and also many unexplained
supernatural events directly associated with crop circles - that for another day.

I do not hold any bad feelings towards
Terje Toftenes for going along with loudly vocal but small group who act
as the social engineers for this subject. A group size you can now count on two hands but who try desperately
to keep alive the idea that most crop circles are not man-made.  At this stage in the research, anyone doing a
reasonable job of investigating the circles knows the score.  The hard core proponents of the myth  that most
crop circles are real are headed by researcher
Michael Glickman, closely followed by Linda Moulton Howe,
Francine Blake
and filmmaker Suzanne Taylor (*1 & *2 Below also her radio interview 2009).  There are others
and they know who they are, who are refusing to acknowledge the truth and are propping up an industry from
which they receive healthy sales from products they produce.

As the coming weeks arrive and events unfold in the fields and more strange things happen to researchers
and human circlemakers we will begin to see that out of the misty, murky past will be seen the true prize in it
all. There will be though a small group who have knowingly fooled others for personal gain who will be seen
for who and what they are but most importantly an extraordinary mystery, more intriguing and significant
than we ever expected will consolidate itself - an intelligent process of which we are but part will become
more clear.  The crop circle phenomenon is not going away because more people are getting smart and
seeing the truth, its about to take a new leap forward into the paranormal because that is what was there to be
seen from the beginning, but lost in the divisions of the time.  This time we will ALL be players, and I believe
some already know this.

Another film-maker Suzanne Taylor, produced the movie 'What on Earth' has great footage but was never a real
attempt to find any answers. The question posed by the title though has now been answered regarding how most
circles arrive in the fields. It is far from answered when it comes to the array of strange experiences
surrounding human consciousness and the crop circle scene. See *1 & 2 below for her response to this article.

As I said back in 2000, the crop circle study will finish up looking into consciousness - thats where its at.
Terje Toftenes with
his EBE award 2011
                     A Message from Joachim Koch in Germany
                                                         May 23, 2011

Hi all you good friends,

once we came together from everywhere to march along for a while the path which the crop circle phenomenon
had shown to us. It was a great time of adventure, enlightment, grace, humbleness and stepping forward
consciousnessly. We all know that our lifes had changed in those days in Wiltshire.

We are now different ones, we have learned the lessons told to us in numerous days and nights up on the hills,
down in the valleys and beside the old stones. Honesty is what was demanded. Honesty in the face of a
phenomenon who/which stressed us to our intellectual and spiritual limits: are you prepared to become a cosmic
civilisation?

Some among the crop circle communitiy failed to realize the potential which was offered to us. They created a
cult, became High Priestesses and Priests of their own ego and lost connection to reality. The result is that they
are now suffering. They suffer from greed for power, from selfishness and are trapped in human commercialism.
They suffer jealously because they realize that others stepped forward. They suffer from themselves.

The crop circle phenomenon came to us to make us aware of ourselves, to invite us to raise our heads again, to
see the beauty of this planet, of the skies and beyond. Some in the crop circle community have not understood.
Sorry for them.

I applaud to what Colin wrote in his response and I would like to thank you all  that you have not forgotten Hans
and me. I think, while other developments happend in front of and behind the scenes, what we both have done
continuously throughout all these years was one of the most profound work that should be done. And I am not
immodest to say that the phenomenon has blessed us quite a few times with its/their special kind of
acknowledgement. This all would not have come true without your help, of course.

I would like to ask Colin to give permission to translate his text into German. I also will ask Suzanne Taylor for
her permission. I think people here in Germany should know what is going on.

In 2013 I will come back to Wiltshire with my "Blue Ribbon Group" to continue our work. Wouldn't it be a great
opportunity to meet us all again, you Dinorsaurs from the old days, to rent the whole
Barge or the Waggon &  
Horses
for a whole evening to sit, drink, eat and talk together and share memories and new information- and a
good music?

Left is a photograph of our latest meeting in Goseck which was unearthed recently and reconstructed. It is a 7000
year old astronomic construction similar to Woodhenge. There we met and spent a few days,
highlighted by a powerful meditation similar to the ones we performed in Wiltshire since 1994.

Greetings and Blessings to you all,

Joachim.

Note *1: Posted May 22, 2011/Updated May 25 2011.(Read also *2 below)

I received a long series of e-mails from filmmaker Suzanne Taylor who asked I make clear that her position has
now changed and that she does not any longer belong to the small number of proponents who say they are nearly
all real. She stated:
"And by the by, I am not one of the hardcore of proponents who think most are real. I’d
appreciate your amending your communication that identifies me that way. In fact, I only have one circle from
2007 and one from 2008 in my movie, and none from years thereafter because I see it as very possible that most
of the circles are human made now, and the ones I used were as carefully chosen as I could for having no taint on
them".

Updated May 25, 2011:

- Suzanne Taylor in correspondance to me says she began to see things turning towards hoaxing in 2004. I should
however draw attention to Taylor's  radio interview September 2009 (20 months ago) in which she says:

Some other intelligence is working. Hoaxers are like terrorists, they plague us putting us off track and waste our
time. They don’t yield secrets because there are none in them. Science has told us that we cant do this – its
definitive. Peer reviewed journals have shown this.

This hoaxing plague comes up and so we covered it in the movie and so we try to counter that – yep some will
fool around but lets talk about the real thing, that’s what we do in the movie.

Listen to her interview for yourself:
HERE

More correspondance with Suzanne Taylor has followed, see below:
Recent TV program by Mexican filmmaker Jaime Maussan
*2:
   Suzanne Taylor’s current position: Now Over to You.
                                                      By Colin Andrews.
                                                          May 27, 2011

On May 20, 2011 I wrote an article praising filmmaker Terji Toftenes for his Skype appearance on
Circlemakers TV (Above) in which I said:

“The hard core proponents of the myth that most crop circles are real are headed by researcher
Michael Glickman, closely followed by Linda Moulton Howe, Francine Blake and filmmaker Suzanne
Taylor . There are others and they know who they are, who are refusing to acknowledge the truth and
are propping up an industry from which they receive healthy sales from products they produce”.

I included Suzanne Taylor because of her public (and non-public) statements to this effect, these speak
for themselves  without any help from me.  However she made contact with me the following day and
since then numerous long emails have ensued, some of them in very threatening tone. I have tried to
understand exactly what she is saying and what her position is.  I posted what she said her current view
is (Note #1 above) and that was at her request. My goal as always, is to work with facts and to establish
truth in this subject and to try to move forward with some level of coherence across the various
perspectives etc..

I have posted below some of the correspondence from Suzanne Taylor in an attempt to be fair to her
also to allow you to formulate for yourselves what she is trying to convey.  I will admit she lost me, but
she is clearly still very agitated, saying things like she could sue me etc etc… even though I have
updated the original article to include her new statements  

I will leave you to make your own assessment.  She did in fact asked that I post ALL the correspondence
between us which I refuse to do only because I don’t like in-fighting at the best of times and I find placing
ones dirty linen out in public repugnant and to be honest, rather boring. So Ive tried to keep it to a fact
finding exercise. There are also extraordinarily serious things happening on our planet and between our
peoples that deserve urgent attention. This kind of dispute can become all too personal and usually so
unnecessary BUT I want to be fair and so Im trying to be accurate here goes – good luck:

Colin Andrews – Posted May 27, 2011

Suzanne Taylor wrote:

May 21, 2011:

And by the by,
I am not one of the hardcore of proponents who think most are real. I’d
appreciate your amending your communication that identifies me that way. In fact, I only have one circle
from 2007 and one from 2008 in my movie, and none from years thereafter because
I see it as very
possible that most of the circles are human made now,
and the ones I used were as carefully
chosen as I could for having no taint on them.

May 22, 2011:

It is erroneous that I have long held to a position of them all being real or even a that a high percentage
are. I told you what I did in my movie, and that footage was selected in 2008, before post-production that
took a couple of years longer. For the next couple of years, before the final cut, the loveliness of the
patterns provided temptation to sandwich them in, especially to keep the movie current to its ultimate
release, but I did not do that because of my concern with the hoaxing situation. Let’s keep straight on
the data.  

Repeating now that your 80%  did not emphasize the 20%. If you had, you would not have gotten a
critique from me, however you arrived at you findings. My voice has only been in support of the
genuineness of visitations, whatever the percent. And even now, on behalf of the contribution the circles
could make to the world, this is not a personal argument with you but a plea that you not let the hoaxing
situation eclipse the fact that there is other intelligence in the universe that has made contact with us – i.
e. the 20% when you made that finding. As long as that remains as a substantive part of what you
discuss, you would not find me alarmed.

May 22, 2011:

I asked you to fix the article that said I believed most formations to be of mysterious origin, not to say I
had changed my mind. Please tell me when this will be removed or corrected, and that you are going to
correct the article in which you misrepresented me.

May 23, 2011:

Anyone who misstates my understanding is as misinformed as you are.

Try “a lot of people told me what you thought” as testimony in a legal proceeding for pinning ideas on
someone.  If you want to go to where I didn’t believe that they were human made, you’d have go back to
before 2004. When the first Mayan circle came in during two nights near Silbury Hill, and it was
understood that hoaxers had been recruiting people to make it, my ears perked up. Now that we are
seven years past that, my change of opinion, reported as if it was recent, wouldn’t be a legitimate way to
describe what was going on with me.  

I don’t know what Note #1 is that you are planning to add, but whatever you post should convey my
statement that you misunderstood the situation and that
for the last seven years I have been open
to there being a considerable amount of hoaxing going on.
If you want to add the statements by
everyone else that say something to the contrary, be my guest.[CA: So on May 25th I posted one of her
own radio interviews on Jim Harold.com]

May 23, 2011:

This is an erroneous posting on your website:              

Filmmaker Suzanne Taylor asked I make it clear that her position has now changed and she     
believes most crop circles could be human made.
My posting May 20th has received a large
amount of interest (Top rated article) and defines the current situation in crop circle research.

This is typical of why, over the years, I have taken issue with you. First of all, you got the data wrong in
your article.
I was not someone who believed them all to be the real thing, as you erroneously
reported.
That’s what I asked you to make clear. Here’s what I said:

“I am not one of the hardcore of proponents who think most are real. I’d appreciate your amending your
communication that identifies me that way. In fact, I only have one circle from 2007 and one from 2008 in
my movie, and none from years thereafter
because I see it as very possible that most of the
circles are human made now,
and the ones I used were as carefully chosen as I could for having no
taint on them.”            

Now, you have totally fabricated the idea that my position has changed, making it appear that I have
seen the light and not that I am criticizing you for printing something that wasn’t true.   

May 22, 2010:

First of all, you got the data wrong in your article. I was not  someone who believed them all to be the
real thing, as you erroneously reported. That’s what I asked you to make clear. Here’s what I said:            

“I am not one of the hardcore of proponents who think most are real. I’d appreciate your amending your
communication that identifies me that way. In fact, I only have one circle from 2007 and one from 2008 in
my movie, and none from years thereafter because I see it as very possible that most of the circles are
human made now, and the ones I used were as carefully chosen as I could for having no taint  on them.”

May 25, 2011:

“I told you that my concern about hoaxing took a turn in 2004.  And I have no idea how many
are hoaxed, but I see the possibility that a lot of them are”.

May 25, 2011:

What I did say was this: You never heard me say I believe that most are real, and indeed the
hoaxers are a plague on  serious research of the phenomenon.

I am not mincing words but what’s happening is that you are taking my words and giving them
different meanings. I was an English major  and I graduated from the university with the
highest honors.  I got just about 100% on everything.  I was clear in what I said and you
decided I said something different.

Now, you have totally fabricated the idea that my position has changed, making it appear that I have
seen the light and not that I am criticizing you for printing something that wasn’t true.

May 26, 2011:

Colin, What are you talking about? Once again, here is where I am at.
I have no idea how many are
hoaxed -- it could be most of them and it could be much less than that.
I am not one of the
holdouts who believes there isn’t much hoaxing going on, and haven’t been for years.  And I absolutely
believe there is a real phenomenon.  What are you doing to twist my words to create meanings I have
not intended?  I speak excellent English.

Personal?  Damn right.  You are painting me as someone I am not. Self centered? Are you crazy? It is
my reality that you are distorting. You demonstrate facts? You are insane.
Very possible most are
human made? Yes, and it’s very possible that they aren’t.
 I care about not misleading people,
and since I couldn’t determine which ones were hoaxed I left them all out of my movie – I care enough
about reflecting the closet to truth I can come that I hurt my own movie by not including more of the
current formations. That doesn’t mean I thought they all were hoaxed, but that I couldn’t’ determine. I
doubt that you are on weed, since that produces insight.  Maybe anti-depressants, because they dull
your senses.

I am going to post a statement on all the crop circle Facebook pages, that attests to your distorting my
position and your refusing to deal with it, if you do not do right by me.

If you want to have a dialogue in which we could compare notes, like I think the whole croppie community
should be engaged in, that would be healthy.  But to keep throwing challenges to me is ridiculous,
especially after over and over I answer you.  You are buffered on your website by not allowing any
comment, so  whatever distortion you post goes unchallenged, and you are a popular destination so we
fall victim to you in this internet age when wrong information spreads everywhere.  I keep getting emails
where, one at time, I have to explain what I think that isn’t what you report.  This is a horrible position to
force me into.  I could sue you for libel.
------------------------------------------------------- Clip

       And so Suzanne Taylor’s current position is what? - END
Goseck, Germany. Copyright: Joachim Koch
Crop Circles Decoded!!! By Terje Toftenes